This paper discusses a funerary discovery from the Eneolithic site of Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă (Romania). Rescue excavations in Trench V/2018 uncovered an unusual mortuary context, an irregularly shaped pit containing the skeletal remains of three individuals: two non-adults and one female. Palaeopathological analysis revealed metabolic stress indicators, such as cribrotic lesions (cribra femoralis and cribra orbitalia) and endocranial changes in the non-adults, while the adult female displayed minor degenerative alterations. No traumatic injuries were observed on any of the skeletal remains. The individuals were discovered at different depths, indicating distinct depositional events. Radiocarbon data indicates that the individuals’ deaths occurred within a short temporal span. The archaeological context shows that the pit was initially used in multiple domestic sequences, possibly for clay extraction or storage, before being reused as a burial place. The associated artefacts, not directly linked to the funerary depositions, are attributed to the Foeni group, placing the discovery within a mid-5th millennium BC timeframe.
[1] Mihai Gligor, Aşezarea neolitică şi eneolitică de la Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă în lumina noilor cercetări [Alba Iulia- Lumea Nouă Neolithic and Eneolithic Settlement in the Light of Recent Research] (Cluj-Napoca: Mega, 2009), Pl. XX.
[2] Mihai Gligor, “Ceramica pictată Foeni din situl arheologic Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă: de la studiul tipologico-stilistic la investigaţiile arheometrice” [Foeni painted pottery from the archaeological site of Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă: from typological-stylistic studies to archaeometric investigations], TS 12 (2020): 51, pl. XVI.
[3] For the biconical bowls, see: Gligor, Aşezarea neolitică, Pl. LXVII/1, LXX/5–8, LXXIII/2–3, LXXXVIII/2, 4–5; for the carinated bowls with rounded carina, see: Gligor, Aşezarea neolitică, Pl. CXVII/7–8, 10, 12, CXXXVI/3–8, CXXXVII/1–10, 13–19; for the pedestal vessels, see: Gligor, Aşezarea neolitică, Pl. LXXXV/4–5, CXII–CXVI); for the lids, see: Gligor, Aşezarea neolitică, Pl. CXVII/1–3, 5–6, CXVIII/1–5, 8–10.
[4] Gligor, “Ceramica pictată,” Pl. II, IV–VIII, XII–XIII.
[5] Florin Draşovean, “Die Petreşti-Kultur im Banat,” Praehistorische Zeitschrift 72 (1997): figs. 8/1a–b, 10/10, 14/4, 9, 18/9a–b, 19/1, 20/a, d, 21/1–5; Florin Draşovean, “Transylvania and the Banat in the Late Neolithic: The Origins of the Petreşti Culture,” Antaeus 27 (2004): figs. 3/1–8, 4/1–5, 5/1–6, 6/1-6; Florin Draşovean, “Cultural Relationships in the Late Neolithic in the Banat,” in Ten Years After: The Neolithic of the Balkans, as Uncovered by the Last decade of Research, eds. Florin Draşovean, Dan L. Ciobotariu, and Margaret Maddison (Marineasa, 2009), fig. 9; Julia Braungart, Studien zur frühkupferzeitlichen Foeni-Gruppe im südwestlichen Rumänien anhand der Gefäßkeramik aus Foeni-Cimitirul Ortodox (Mega, 2022), 104–106, Abb. 87–89, Taf. 229–230.
[6] Gligor, “Ceramica pictată,” 17–19.
[7] Christopher Bronk Ramsey, “Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates,” Radiocarbon 51, 1 (2009): 337–360.
[8] We extend our gratitude to Mr. Bogdan Condurățeanu, PhD candidate, for his contributions to improving the model previously published by M. Gligor, in “Ceramica pictată,” fig. 3.
[9] Mihai Gligor, Andrei Dorian Soficaru, and Ana Fetcu, “Cranial Fractures in 2005 Early Eneolithic Multiple Burial from Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouǎ (Romania),” AUA hist. 22, I (2018): 41–43.
[10] Henri Duday, Françoise Le Mort, and Anne-Marie Tillier, “Archaeothanatology and Funeral Archaeology. Application to the Study of Primary Single Burials,” Anthropologie LII/3 (2014): 241.
[11] Henri Duday, Lezioni di archeotanatologia: archeologia funeraria e antropologia di campo [The Archaeology of the Dead: Lectures in Archaeothanatology], transcritto da Enrico Monzeglio (Arti grafiche Mengarelli, 2006), 72–74; Duday et al., “Archaeothanatology,” 241.
[12] Jane Buikstra and Douglas H. Ubelaker, Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History (Arkansas Archaeological Society, 1994); Jaroslav Bruzek, “A Method for Visual Determination of Sex Using the Human Hip Bone,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 117 (2020): 157–168; Steve Brooks and Judy Myers Suckey, “Skeletal Age Determination Based on the Os Pubis: A Comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks Methods,” Human evolution 5, no. 3 (1990): 227–238; Clarke Owen Lovejoy et al. “Chronological Metamorphosis of the Auricular Surface of the Ilium: A New Method for the Determination of Adult Skeletal Age at Death,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68 (1985): 15–28; Clarke Owen Lovejoy, “Dental Wear in the Libben Population. Its Functional Pattern and Role in Determination of Adult Skeletal Age at Death,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68 (1985): 47–56.
[13] Mary E. Lewis, Palaeopathology of Children: Identification of Pathological Conditions in the Human Skeletal Remains of Non-Adults (Elsevier Academic Press, 2018), 141–143, fig. 6.15; Claudine Abegg et al., “Cases of Serpens Endocrania Symmetrica in Young Individuals from Neolithic Western Switzerland: Description and Interpretation,” International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 30, no. 3 (2020): 406–7, Table 1; Israel Hershkovitz et al., “Serpens Endocrania Symmetrica (SES): A New Term and a Possible Clue for Identifying Intrathoracic Diseases in Skeletal Populations,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 118, 3 (2002): 201–216.
[14] Lewis, Palaeopathology, 193–4; Phillip L. Walker et al., “The Causes of Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia: A Reappraisal of the Iron-Deficiency-Anaemia Hypothesis,” American Journal of Anthropology 137 (2009): 109–125; Ricardo Gomes, Lidia Catarino, and Ana Luisa Santos, “The Role of Fe, S, P, Ca, and Sr in Porous Skeletal Lesions: A Study on Non-Adult Individuals Using pXRF,” Biological Trace Element Research 203 (2025): 591–607.
[15] Tianyi Wang et al., “Investigating the Association between Intestinal Parasite Infection and Cribra Orbitalia in the Medieval Population of Cambridge, UK,” Int. J. Paleopathol. 44 (2024): 20–26, fig. 2.
[16] Bruce Rothschild et al., “Cribra Orbitalia is a Vascular Phenomenon Unrelated to Marrow Hyperplasia or Anaemia: Paradigm Shift for Cribra Orbitalia,” The Anatomical Record 304, 8 (2020): 1709–16.
[17] Gomes et al. “The Role,” 591, 595, 602, fig. 3.
[18] Tony Waldron, Palaeopathology (Cambridge University Press, 2009), 241.
[19] Charlotte Roberts and Keith Manchester, The Archaeology of Disease (The History Press, 2010), 81.
[20] Viorel Panaitescu et al.,“Cranial Fractures Identified in a Late Neolithic Population, Exhumed from the Middle Basin of Mureş River - Lumea Nouă (Romania),” Rom. J. Leg. Med. XVI, 4 (2008): 261–268; Mihai Gligor, Mariana Roșu, and Viorel Panaitescu, “Bioarchaeological Inferences from Neolithic Human Remains at Alba Iulia - Lumea Nouă (Romania),” in “Homines, Funera, Astra”. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Funerary Anthropology. 5–8 June 2011, “1 Decembrie 1918” University (Alba Iulia, Romania), eds. Raluca Kogălniceanu et al. (Archaeopress, 2012), 57–70; Mihai Gligor and Kirsty McLeod, “Disarticulation as a Mortuary Practice in Early Eneolithic Transylvania? A Case Study from Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă,” AUA hist. 18, II (2014): 61–86; Mihai Gligor and Kirsty McLeod, “Disposal of the Dead. Uncommon Mortuary Practices from Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă 2003 Excavation,” in Homines, Funera, Astra 2. Life beyond Death in Ancient Times. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Funerary Anthropology, 23–26 September 2012, “1 Decembrie 1918” University (Alba Iulia, Romania), eds. Raluca Kogălniceanu et al. (Archaeopress, 2015), 25–41; Christina Lundberg and Mihai Gligor, “Place of Death and Place of Rest. Commingled Human Remains from Alba Iulia - Lumea Nouă 2015 Early Eneolithic Funerary Discovery,” Aua hist. 19, II (2015): 71–105; Gligor et al., “Cranial Fractures,” 27–97; Mihai Gligor et al., “A Ditch in Time: A Bioarchaeological Analysis of the Human Skeletal Remains Discovered at Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă (Romania),” in Homines, Funera, Astra 3–4, The Multiple Faces of Death and Burial. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Funerary Anthropology “1 Decembrie 1918” University (Alba Iulia, Romania), eds. Raluca Kogălniceanu et al. (Archaeopress, 2023), 47–73.
[21] Marian-Bogdan Condurăţeanu and Mihai Gligor, “Topografia și cronologia descoperirilor funerare eneolitice de la Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă (cercetările 2003-2018)” [The Topography and Chronology of Eneolithic Funerary Discoveries at Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă (2003–2018 Research)], SPre 18 (2021): figs. 7–8, 60–62.
[22] Duday, “Lezioni,” 163.
[23] Philippe Lefranc and Fanny Chenal, “Deposits of Bodies in Circular Pits in the Neolithic Period (Mid-Fifth to the Mid-Fourth Millennium BCE): Deposits, Waste or Ritual Remnants?,” Human Remains and Violence, 5, no. 1 (2019): 55–54, figs. 1–5.
[24] Krisztián Oross and Tibor Marton, “Neolithic burials of the Linearbandkeramik settlement at Balatonszárszó and their European context,” ActaArchHung 63 (2012): 259-262, table 1, figs. 1, 4.
[25] See supra, note 20.
Tab. 1. Archaeological context of the samples and radiocarbon data from Cx002a, Trench V/2018, Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă.
Fig. 1. Modelled 14C data from Cx002a, Trench V/2018, Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă.
Fig. 2. Skeletal inventory for M1 (in brown), M2 (in green) and M3 (in blue).
Plate I. Google Maps capture (©Google) showing Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă Archaeological site and the location of Trench V/2018.
Plate II. Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă: M1 and M2, Cx002a (1); M3, Cx002a (2).
Plate III. Foeni painted pottery (After Gligor, “Ceramica pictată,” Pl. IX).
Plate IV. Foeni painted pottery (After Gligor, “Ceramica pictată,” Pl. XI).
Plate V. Foeni painted pottery (After Gligor, “Ceramica pictată,” Pl. X/1a–1d).
Plate VI. Foeni pottery: biconical bowl (1); carinated bowls with rounded carina (2-4).
Plate VII. Foeni pottery: carinated bowl with rounded carina (1); pedestal vessel (2).
Plate VIII. Foeni pottery: lids (1-2).
Plate IX. The skeletal remains of M1 in anatomical connection.
Plate X. The skeletal remains of M2 in anatomical connection.
Plate XI. The skeletal remains of M3 in anatomical connection (1); endocranial lesions on the skull of M3 (2).