Professor Keith Hitchins (1931-2020)

15 October 2020


Authors
DANIEL DUMITRAN
Pages
307-311
Abstract

Probably the generosity reflected by such a warm smile was the feature imposing from the start upon everyone who met Professor Keith Hitchins. The feature made such a meeting to be just the first in a succession desired to be as long as possible, and to become, oftentimes, an intellectual amity, even if the age gap prompted the younger interlocutors to see him rather like a mentor. For that very reason, the separation from him can only be an occasion to remember the joy so many times felt in the lovely moments spent together. The generosity manifested at the level of interpersonal relations was matched by an admirable comprehension for the history of Southeastern Europe and, mainly, for the history of Romania, to which he devoted himself as early as the time when he studied at Harvard University, when he drew close, prompted by his professor Robert Lee Wolff, to the personality of the Orthodox Metropolitan of Transylvania, Andrei Șaguna, and then to the precursory events of the Romanian national movement.

His doctoral thesis, The Rumanian National Movement in Transylvania, 1780-1849, published by Harvard University Press in 1969, was owed to this direction, Harvard University Press also publishing in 1977 the monograph Orthodoxy and Nationality: Andreiu Șaguna and the Rumanians of Transylvania, 1846-1873. Underlain by the elaborate research carried out in Romanian and Central European archives and libraries, but also by the European historiographical perspective pointed out, years ago, by historian Pompiliu Teodor in the preface of the Romanian edition of the monograph cited herein,[1] the two works faithfully followed these directions in the next decades, reflected in his books printed in English or in their Romanian versions.

More numerous after the fall of the communist regime, Hitchins’s works were not absent before either, if we consider the volume of 1987, Conștiință națională și acțiune politică la românii din Transilvania (1700-868) [National Consciousness and Political Action among Romanians in Transylvania (1700-1868)], which brought new inspiration by addressing the issue of popular religiosity and by emphasizing the primacy of the spiritual factor at a time when Romanian historiography was governed by the principles of dialectical and historical materialism. He was starting from the premise that the popular anti-union reactions of the mid-eighteenth century proved the people’s attachment to traditional religious forms and showed that rural society was guided by religion to a much greater extent than by political or economic circumstances.[2] Alternatively, the most learned members of the uniate clergy, under the influence of early European Enlightenment thought, devised a new path of development based on the idea of ​​nation, trying to harmonize the Orthodox rural tradition with the intellectual dynamism of Europe, in order to give birth to a new entity – the modern Romanian nation.[3] Later, the historian extended the analysis devoted to the confessional disorders in Transylvania, noticing, in the context of the movement led by the monk Sofronie from Cioara, its characteristic organizational refinement and the long-term consequences of the establishment of the Transylvanian Orthodox Episcopate – the development of education and culture in the Orthodox confessional milieu. In parallel, the uniate ecclesiastical elite was conceiving of its Church as an expression of the national spirit, combining the spiritual heritage of Eastern Orthodoxy with the assertion of Latinity through religious union.[4]

In the same years, Keith Hitchins published in Mitropolia Ardealului review, in collaboration with Ioan N. Beju, director of the Metropolitan Library of Sibiu, documents relevant to the ecclesiastical history of the Transylvanian Romanians, identified in external archives originating mainly from the archive of the Aulic Chancellery of Transylvania.[5] He thus inaugurated a fundamental direction of research which Romanian historians were able to systematically follow only after 1990. The richness of archival investigations undertaken during this period in the Central European archives, primarily in Budapest and Vienna, is evidenced by the volume of documents published later, in collaboration with Laura Stanciu and the author of these lines, regarding the external sources of the first decade of confessional confrontations between uniate and non-uniate Romanians in Transylvania.[6] This volume had the merit of having put into circulation, among unpublished documents, a series of primary sources previously known only through some copies and excerpts, thus facilitating a more thorough and modern analysis of the evolution of the confrontations and factors involved (authorities, communities, individuals).

The 1990s affirmed Keith Hitchins position as one of the most knowledgeable researchers of Romanian modernity, through a volume of studies that continued the investigation of the relationship between national consciousness and political action,[7] but also through a new series of works in which the author proposed a re-evaluation of the history of the Romanian national movement in Transylvania, starting from the eighteenth century and until the outbreak of the First World War.[8] He thus revealed the change in the structure of the Romanian elite, from a predominantly clerical one in the eighteenth century to one in which the secular intelligentsia aspired to assert their primacy, followed by the representatives of the middle class, who gave it a bourgeois character.[9] The historian also included in this series the Romanian version of the monograph dedicated to Metropolitan Andrei Șaguna, which was thus made better known to Romanian historiography. A volume published in 1997 revealed another topic that came to the author’s attention, in addition to those related to the national movement and the problem of identity: the history of the workers’ movement and socialist thought, whereby the historian addressed another dimension of the modernization of Romanian society.[10]

The culmination of his dedication to the history of Romania was illustrated by the two syntheses devoted to the subject, first published in English, through which he offered a broad perspective on modern and contemporary Romanian history between 1774 (the year of the Treaty of Kuciuk-Kainargi) and 1947 (marking the establishment of the communist regime in Romania).[11] This time considering the entire Romanian territory, the historian followed the transition period from agrarian economic and social structures and medieval political forms to a society shaped by urban and industrial values, united by loyalty to the unitary state,[12] in the first case, and in the second one, the matured phase of the nation’s formation and its integration into Europe.[13] The recognition of the quality of his historiographical work was represented by his collaboration to a synthesis of the history of Romania, for which he wrote the part dedicated to the modern period, subsumed to the idea of ​​ accomplishment the Romanian nation.[14] Another result of the collaboration with representative Romanian historians was his contribution to the two-volume international dictionary of historians, edited by Lucian Boia under the auspices of the International Committee of Historical Sciences and the International Commission on the History of Historiography.[15] In 2014, he also published a brief history of Romania with Cambridge University Press, which came out the following year in Romanian.[16]

Any recollection of this historian’s passion for the international reflection on the subjects of Romanian history cannot omit the five volumes of Romanian studies published by Brill Printing House between 1970 and 1986,[17] with contributions of some historians who became better known to the Romanian public only after 1989, such as Emil Turdeanu, Barbara Jelavich, Katherine Verdery and Catherine Durandin, contributors to the latest volume of the publication.[18] Interested in more recent years in the general history of Southeastern Europe, on which he was preparing a work intended to be published in the Oxford History of Early Modern Europe series,[19] but also interested in the history of Near Asia, to which he dedicated the journal he published between 1995 and 2008,[20] Keith Hitchins was honored in various homage publications, such as those published by the Encyclopedic Publishing House in 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016, by Vatra journal in 2006,[21] and through academic titles (honorary member of the Romanian Academy, of the historic institutes of Iași and Cluj-Napoca, of the Institute of Southeastern European Studies in Bucharest, doctor honoris causa of the main universities in Romania, among which was also the one in Alba Iulia, in 2001). He was among the members of the research project The Union of Transylvanian Romanians with the Church of Rome, coordinated by the Pro Oriente Foundation and the University of Vienna, addressing topics of Romanian and Southeast European ecclesiastical history.[22] From 2007, he was also a member of the editorial board of the journal published by the history department of the University of Alba Iulia, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Historica. These lines are offered as a modest homage to the historian, professor and man, Keith Hitchins, with the conviction that the meetings with him have always been a privilege.

Farewell, dear Professor!

Keywords

Keith Hitchins, Romanian history, obituary

References

[1] Keith Hitchins, Ortodoxie și naționalitate. Andrei Șaguna și românii din Transilvania, 1846-1873 (Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic, 1995), 9.

[2] Idem, „Religia și conștiința națională românească în Transilvania în secolul XVIII” [Romanian Religion and National Consciousness in Transylvania in the eighteenth Century], in Conștiință națională și acțiune politică la românii din Transilvania (1700-1868) (Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1987), 32. Originally, the study was published in 1979, in Slavonic and East European Review.

[3] Ibid., 58.

[4] Idem, „Tradiție religioasă și conștiință națională la românii din Transilvania, 1730-1780” [Religious Tradition and National Consciousness Among the Romanians from Transylvania, 1730-1780], in Mit și realitate în istoriografia românească [Myth and Reality in Romanian Historiography] (Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 1997), 11-32. Originally, the study was published in 1986, in Harvard Ukrainian Studies journal.

[5] Keith Hitchins, Ioan N. Beju, „Documente privitoare la trecutul Bisericii Ortodoxe Române din Transilvania după 1761” [Documents Regarding the Past of the Romanian Orthodox Church in Transylvania after 1761], MA XIX, 1-3 (1974): 13-46; Iidem, „Statistica românilor ortodocși din Transilvania din anul 1766” [Statistics of the Romanian Orthodox in Transylvania from 1766], MA XXII, 7-9 (1977): 505-551; Iidem, „Conscripția clerului ortodox transilvan din 1767” [The Census of the Transylvanian Orthodox Clergy from 1767], MA XXIX, 7-8 (1984): 534-568; Iidem, „Conscripția comitatenză a clerului român din Alba de Jos, anul 1733” [The County Census of the Romanian Clergy from Alba de Jos, Year 1733], MA XXXII, 4 (1987): 75-90 + I-XXXI; Iidem, „Conscripția scaunală a clerului român de pe Pământul Crăiesc, anul 1733” [The Census of Romanian Clergy from Royal Lands, Year 1733], MA XXXIV, 3 (1989): 99-116, 4 (1989): I-XXIV. These studies were reunited in 1991 in the book, Biserica Ortodoxă Română în secolul XVIII. Conscripții, statistici [The Romanian Orthodox Church in the Eighteenth Century. Conscriptions, Statistics] (Urbana, Sibiu, 1991).

[6] Laura Stanciu, Keith Hitchins, Daniel Dumitran, ed., Despre Biserica românilor din Transilvania. Documente externe (1744-1754) [About the Romanian Church in Transylvania. External Documents (1744-1754)] (Cluj-Napoca: Mega, 2009).

[7] Keith Hitchins, Conștiință națională și acțiune politică la românii din Transilvania, 1868-1918  [National Consciousness and Political Action Among Romanians in Transylvania, 1868-1918] (Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1992).

[8] Idem, A Nation Discovered: Romanian Intellectuals in Transylvania and the Idea of Nation, 1700-1848 (Bucharest: The Encyclopaedic Publishing House, 1999); Idem, A Nation Affirmed: The Romanian National Movement in Transylvania, 1860-1914 (Bucharest: The Encyclopaedic Publishing House, 1999; the Romanian edition appeared at the same publishing house, in 2000).

[9] Idem, Afirmarea națiunii: mișcarea națională românească din Transilvania, 1860-1914 (Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 2000), 12, 96.

[10] Idem, Mit și realitate în istoriografia românească, with four studies devoted to this subject, among which only one represented an older research, published in English in 1971, as the others were more recent approaches: „Formarea mișcării muncitorești române, 1870-1914” [The Shaping of the Romanian Workers’ Movement, 1870-1914] (originally published in English in 1990); „Social-democrația și țărănimea din România, 1870-1914” [Social Democracy and Peasantry in Romania, 1870-1914] (also published in English, at a later date, in Aad Blok, Keith Hitchins, Raymond Markey and Birger Simonson, eds., Urban Radicals, Rural Allies: Social Democracy and the Agrarian Issue, 1870-1914 (Bern: Peter Lang, 2002)); „Mișcarea comunistă din România, 1917-1944” [The Communist Movement in Romania, 1917-1944].

[11] Idem, Rumania, 1866-1947 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, published in first Romanian edition by Humanitas Printing House in 1996); Idem, The Romanians, 1774-1866 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, published in first Romanian edition by Humanitas Printing House in 1998).

[12] Idem, Românii, 1774-1866 (Bucharest: Humanitas, 1998), 7.

[13] Idem, România, 1866-1947 (Bucharest: Humanitas, 1996), 7.

[14] Idem, „Desăvârșirea națiunii române” [The Accomplishment of the Romanian Nation], in Mihai Bărbulescu, Dennis Deletant, Keith Hitchins, Șerban Papacostea, Pompiliu Teodor, Istoria României [The History of Romania] (Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 1998), 351-485.

[15] Lucian Boia, Ellen Nore, Keith Hitchins, and Georg G. Iggers, eds., Great Historians from Antiquity to 1800: An International Dictionary (New York, Westport, London: Greenwood Press, 1989); Iidem, eds., Great Historians of the Modern Age: An International Dictionary (New York, Westport, London: Greenwood Press, 1991).

[16] Keith Hitchins, A Concise History of Romania (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, with the Romanian version published by Polirom Printing House in 2015).

[17] Idem, ed., Rumanian Studies: An International Annual of the Humanities and Social Sciences (Leiden: Brill, 1970, 1972, 1976, 1979, 1986).

[18] Paul E. Michelson, review of Rumanian Studies: An International Annual of the Humanities and Social Sciences, edited by Keith Hitchins, vol. 5, Slavic Review 48, 2 (1989): 329-330, https://doi.org/10.2307/2499151.

[19] Marcel Popa, ed., Keith Hitchins at 85: Biographical and Professional Information (Bucharest: Enciclopedica Publishing House [2016]), 13.

[20] Keith Hitchins, Joyce Blau, eds., Journal of Kurdish Studies (Leuven: Peeters Press, 1995, 1997, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2008), accessed on 1.12.2020, https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php? url=journal&journal_code=JKS.

[21] Popa, ed., Keith Hitchins at 85, 5-6; Nicoleta Sălcudeanu, ed., „Keith Hitchins și istoria românilor” [Keith Hitchins and the History of the Romanians], Vatra XXXIII, 6 (424) (2006): 29-87.

[22] Contribuțiile sale au fost publicate în cele două volume principale ale proiectului: Johann Marte et al., Unirea românilor transilvăneni cu Biserica Romei [The Union of the Transylvanian Romanians with the Church of Rome], vol. I. De la începuturi până în anul 1701 [From the Beginnings until 1701] (Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 2010), 140-165; vol. II. De la 1701 până în anul 1761 [From 1701 to 1761] (Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 2015), 436-447, 528-553, 654-667.